Industry Applications (EDGEBIC)

Print Shop Quoting: Turn a Job Around With a Real Press Schedule Behind It

User Solutions TeamUser Solutions Team
|
9 min read

Print shop quoting software that runs a real press simulation lets you quote a job's lead time and price against your actual press load, and EDGEBIC by User Solutions does it in seconds without disturbing the production plan. For a print shop living on quick turns, the quote is a promise about a press queue that changes hour by hour. This post is about quoting from a real schedule, and re-quoting as fast as customers change their minds.

The base idea of loading work against limited capacity is what is production scheduling, and the mechanics of a real quote simulation are also covered from the fabrication angle in fabrication quoting. Here the emphasis is print-specific: high job volume, short runs, and makeready that decides the quote. One honesty note: this is quote simulation and what-if promise dates, a schedule you run and read, not a live commit-to-promise transaction against reserved press time.

The published turnaround that breaks under load

Most print shops quote off a published turnaround. Two days for digital, five for offset, whatever the norm is. It works until the presses fill up, and then every job inherits the same optimistic number while the real queue stretches to four days. The customer hears two, the job takes four, and the relationship takes the damage.

The honest lead time depends entirely on how loaded the specific press is the week the job would run, and that is invisible to a published number. Print makes this worse than most industries because job volume is high and runs are short, so the queue churns constantly and a number that was right this morning is wrong by afternoon. A quote needs to see the queue, not a catalog.

How the quote simulation works

When you build a quote, the system creates a temporary order for the job and quantity and runs the full finite-capacity scheduler against your current press load. Two things make this safe to do all day: it runs in memory, and it writes nothing to the live schedule. The temporary order exists only long enough to be scheduled and is removed afterward.

The simulation respects the same shift calendars, press capacity, routing, and setup times as a real run, so the estimated start and end dates it reads back reflect the actual queue the job would join. On a slow week that might confirm your two-day turnaround; on a slammed week it shows four, and you learn that at quote time while you can still make a real decision about expediting.

Cost from the same schedule

Cost rolls up off the simulated schedule. The system sums the work hours on each work center and multiplies by that center's labor rate, adds material for stock and consumables, then applies your markup to derive a unit price. Because the hours are real work content and not wall-clock span, a job that sits in a queue over the weekend is not charged for the idle days.

Take a 3,000-piece run through a press step and a bindery step. If the press step totals 40 hours at 90 dollars an hour and the bindery totals 12 hours at 45, that is 3,600 plus 540 in labor, plus stock, marked up to a unit price and paired with a simulated finish date. Change the quantity and re-run, and every number moves with it in seconds.

Re-quoting as fast as the job changes

Print quotes rarely stay still. The customer wants 5,000 instead of 3,000, a different stock, an extra finishing pass. Because the simulation runs in seconds and touches nothing live, you re-run for each change and read the new lead time and price immediately.

One useful behavior: if you already typed a unit price, re-running the simulation will not overwrite it, so you keep manual pricing control. When you want the price re-derived from the new cost, reset it and let the markup recompute. This lets you hold a negotiated price steady while still seeing how the cost moved underneath it. You can also run the quote backward to test a hard customer date directly: a backward quote right-aligns the job to finish by the requested date and tells you plainly whether it fits, which is the forward versus backward choice applied to a delivery promise.

Makeready is the quote, on short runs

On a short run, makeready is most of the job, and a flat setup allowance is where print estimates go wrong. The simulation uses the routing's setup times when it computes each operation's duration, so makeready is in the lead time and the labor cost from the start.

Where changeover depends on what ran before, a color-to-color change versus a full stock-and-wash, a sequence-dependent setup matrix supplies the correct makeready for that specific transition. The plan then reflects that a 500-piece run quoted after a light change is genuinely cheaper and faster than the same run after a heavy one. This is the same matrix that drives production sequencing in print setup matrix scheduling, reused so the quote and the floor agree on what a changeover costs. For short-run shops, that alignment is the difference between a quote that holds and one that bleeds on every job.

From approved quote to press schedule

When the customer approves, the quote converts to a manufacturing order in one step, carrying the cost, markup, unit price, customer link, and scheduling direction. The real schedule reproduces the quoted plan, so the press queue you promised against is the press queue the job actually joins. The stored cost breakdown becomes the baseline for comparing the estimate to actuals once the job runs, which feeds directly into print job tracking.

That closed loop is the point. The quote, the schedule, and the eventual variance come from one model of your shop, so a busy week never quietly turns your published turnaround into a broken promise. It is the estimating discipline User Solutions has brought to manufacturers since 1991, promising dates from a real capacity picture rather than a hopeful one.

Put a real quick-turn job in front of it. Bring a routing and a due date to a demo and watch the simulation return a lead time and price your presses can stand behind. When you are ready to feed it your product and order data, EDGEBIC reads it through flexible import and export masks. The EDGEBIC by industry guide maps this to the rest of a print shop's needs, including due-date scheduling once the job is on the floor.

Expert Q&A: Deep Dive

Q: We publish a two-day turnaround and honor it until the presses get slammed, then everything slips and customers are furious. How does simulating the quote fix that?

A: It replaces the published turnaround with a per-job answer. When you build the quote, the system drops a temporary order into a copy of your current load and runs the real scheduler, so the promised date reflects the actual queue on the press the job needs that week. On a slow week it might confirm the two days; on a slammed week it shows four, and you find out at quote time instead of at delivery. You can still choose to promise two and expedite, but now that is a decision you make with the real queue in front of you, not a promise the calendar quietly breaks for you.

Q: Short runs are where makeready eats us alive, and our flat setup allowance is always wrong. Can the quote reflect the actual changeover?

A: Yes, and it is where print quoting benefits most from a real simulation. The routing's setup times feed the estimate, and where changeover depends on the previous job, a sequence-dependent setup matrix supplies the true makeready for that specific transition, a fast color-to-color change versus a long stock-and-wash change. On a short run where makeready is most of the job, that difference is the whole quote. The simulation carries it into the lead time and the labor cost, so a 500-piece run quoted after a light change and the same run quoted after a heavy one come out correctly different.

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to Transform Your Production Scheduling?

User Solutions has been helping manufacturers optimize their production schedules for over 35 years. One-time license, 5-day implementation.

User Solutions Team

User Solutions Team

Manufacturing Software Experts

User Solutions has been developing production planning and scheduling software for manufacturers since 1991. Our team combines 35+ years of manufacturing software expertise with deep industry knowledge to help factories optimize their operations.

Let's Solve Your Challenges Together