- Home
- Blog
- Shop Floor Execution
- Reading a Shift Handoff Summary in EDGEBIC
The shift handoff summary in EDGEBIC by User Solutions is a single screen that tells the oncoming crew exactly what they are inheriting: the shift's setup, run, and down hours, the good and scrap piece totals, and the most recent pauses and down events with their reasons. It turns a shift change from a game of telephone into a factual handover. Reading a shift handoff summary manufacturing crews can trust is a small skill with an outsized payoff, because the first thing the next operator does often depends on what the last one was fighting.
Shift changes are where information goes to die. The outgoing operator remembers half of what happened; the oncoming operator inherits none of it and rediscovers the coolant problem forty minutes into their run. The handoff summary exists to close that gap. This article walks through what is on it and how to read each part.
Where to Find It
On the kiosk, the header carries a Handoff button. Tapping it opens the Shift Handoff summary. It is available at any time, but it earns its keep in the last few minutes of a shift, when the outgoing operator briefs the next crew, and in the first few minutes of the next, when the oncoming operator reads what they are stepping into. The kiosk is bound to one work center, so the handoff is specific to that machine, which is exactly the scope a floor handover needs. For the wider kiosk tour, see how to handle a shift handoff on the kiosk.
The Three Things It Shows
The summary has three parts, and each answers a different question.
The hour buckets: how the machine spent its time
The hours are split into three buckets: setup, run, and down. This split is deliberate and important. Only run time (plus rework) counts as production hours; setup, down, and idle time are kept separate so nobody's output is judged on a changeover or a breakdown.
Reading the buckets tells you the shape of the shift at a glance:
- High run, low setup and down: a clean production shift. The next crew can keep going.
- High setup: a changeover-heavy shift. Maybe several jobs ran, maybe one changeover ran long and is worth a look in setup-variance reporting.
- High down: something was broken or waiting. The recent pauses list will tell you what.
Because the buckets are separated, an eight-hour clock shift that shows 5.9 run hours is not a mystery. The other 2.1 hours are accounted for in setup and down, right there on the screen.
The piece totals: how much came off
The summary shows the shift's good and scrap piece totals. Good pieces are the ones that count toward the job's produced quantity; scrap is tracked separately, each piece carrying a reason. This is the same good-only rule that flows into the schedule, covered in how piece counts feed the EDGEBIC schedule.
A scrap total that is high relative to good pieces is a signal for the oncoming operator to check the setup or the material before running more. The reasons behind those scrap pieces are captured too, and they surface in the scrap Pareto reports.
The recent pauses: what was going wrong
The summary lists the most recent pause and down events with their reason codes. This is the part that most directly shapes what the next operator does first. Each pause carries one of four categories (Machine, Material, Quality, or Waiting) and a specific reason. For why that record is so valuable, see what a pause with reason record is worth.
Two coolant pauses in the recent list is not just history: it is an open issue the next crew inherits. The whole point of showing recent pauses is that a pattern crossing a shift boundary does not vanish at the boundary. The oncoming operator reads it and acts before the problem bites them.
A Worked Example
Tuesday, CNC-Mill-1, at the 15:45 shift change. The outgoing operator opens Handoff. The summary reads:
| Bucket | Hours |
|---|---|
| Setup | 0.9 |
| Run | 5.9 |
| Down | 0.7 |
Piece totals: 20 good, 1 scrap.
Recent pauses:
- Machine, coolant reason, 11:30, 40 minutes.
Here is how the oncoming operator reads it in ten seconds. The shift was mostly productive: 5.9 run hours against 0.9 setup and 0.7 down. Twenty good pieces came off, with one scrap on a quality reason, so the process is basically sound. The one down event was a coolant pause mid-morning. The oncoming operator glances at the coolant level before starting their run, notes it as something to watch, and gets going. No rediscovery, no lost forty minutes.
Compare that to a handoff with no data: the next operator starts cold, hits the same coolant issue at 16:20, and loses time the summary would have saved.
Reading It Well
Three habits make the handoff worth reading.
Read the buckets first, the pauses second. The buckets tell you the shape of the shift; the pauses tell you the open issues. Both in ten seconds.
Take the recent pauses as a to-do list. A pause that repeats across the last few events is a problem walking toward you. The list exists so you can meet it prepared.
Trust the split. Do not mentally add setup and down into "wasted time." They are recorded separately for a reason, and the run figure is the honest measure of production. This is the same principle that keeps machine downtime tracking meaningful: separate the causes so you can act on each.
Beyond the Floor
The handoff summary is a floor-level tool, but the data behind it does not stop there. The same reason codes that populate the recent pauses feed the aggregated downtime and scrap reports the supervisor and planner read later. A pattern that first shows up as two coolant pauses on one shift's handoff becomes a bar on the Pareto chart over a month. The handoff is where the pattern is first visible to the person who can do something about it that shift; the report is where it becomes visible to the person who can fix the root cause.
That connection, from a single shift's handoff to the plant's aggregate picture, is part of the larger loop from floor to plan. See how the pieces connect in closing the loop from shop floor to plan and the full shop floor execution guide. Explore the platform at EDGEBIC.
Expert Q&A: Deep Dive
Q: The handoff shows two coolant pauses in the last five events. What should the oncoming operator do with that?
A: Treat it as a warning, not just a log. Two coolant pauses in one shift is a pattern, and the recent pauses list exists precisely so the incoming crew inherits the open issue rather than rediscovering it the hard way. The oncoming operator should check the coolant level and flow before starting the next run, and flag maintenance if it recurs. The reason codes on those pauses also feed your downtime reporting, so the pattern shows up in the Pareto analysis over time too.
Q: Run hours on the handoff are 5.9 but the shift was 8 hours. Where did the other time go?
A: Into setup and down time, which the handoff shows separately for exactly this reason. Of the eight clock hours, setup and pauses accounted for the difference, and the handoff splits them out so nobody judges the run on total elapsed time. If setup ate two hours it may point to a long changeover worth investigating in setup-variance reporting; if down time ate it, the recent pauses list tells you why. The split is what turns a raw eight-hour block into an honest, readable shift.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Transform Your Production Scheduling?
User Solutions has been helping manufacturers optimize their production schedules for over 35 years. One-time license, 5-day implementation.

User Solutions Team
Manufacturing Software Experts
User Solutions has been developing production planning and scheduling software for manufacturers since 1991. Our team combines 35+ years of manufacturing software expertise with deep industry knowledge to help factories optimize their operations.
Share this article
Related Articles
The Schedule Reconciliation Report in EDGEBIC, Explained
Eight parameter checks over two exception grids. See how EDGEBIC reconciles the plan against the plant and shows only the rows that disagree.
Why a Dependent-Parallel Child Is Exempt From the Over-Booked Check
Three synchronized drills book 24 hours on an 8 hour day. That is real plant behavior, not a capacity breach, and flagging it would make the whole check useless.
Confirming a Sub-Assembly Versus the End Product in EDGEBIC
One dialog, two mechanisms. See why confirming an end product reduces the build directly while confirming a sub-assembly works through ordinary stock netting.
