- Home
- Blog
- Outcomes & ROI
- How Import and Export Masks Cut Double Entry Betwe…
How Import and Export Masks Cut Double Entry Between ERP and the Floor
Import and export masks cut double entry by moving order and routing data between your ERP and the scheduling engine through a saved field mapping, so nobody re-keys anything. In EDGEBIC by User Solutions, you define once which ERP column feeds which scheduling field, and every future import reuses that mapping. Orders flow in without retyping, the schedule exports back the same way, and the transcription errors that come from manual re-entry disappear because the data moves through the mask rather than through a keyboard.
This post is about the payoff of not retyping your data. For the full return picture, see the EDGEBIC results guide. For the mechanics of the mapping, see import masks explained.
The Hour Nobody Should Be Spending
Walk into most shops running a scheduling tool alongside an ERP and you will find someone whose morning starts with retyping. They open the ERP, read off the day's orders, and key each one into the scheduling spreadsheet: part number, quantity, due date, customer. It takes an hour, and it is the same hour every day.
That hour is pure waste in two ways. It consumes a skilled person's time on data entry that adds nothing, and it introduces errors, because manual transcription is the most error-prone step in the whole chain. Every field retyped is a chance to transpose a quantity, fat-finger a due date, or mistype a part number, and any one of those turns a correct order into a wrong schedule.
The wrong schedule is worse than the wasted hour. A transposed quantity schedules the wrong amount of work. A mistyped due date prioritizes the wrong job. The error made at the keyboard propagates through every decision the schedule drives, and nobody notices until the shop builds the wrong thing.
What a Mask Actually Does
An import mask is a saved mapping between your ERP's exported data and the scheduling engine's fields. Your ERP exports orders as an Excel, CSV, or database extract. You define once which column in that extract feeds which scheduling field: this column is the part number, that one is the quantity, that one is the due date. You save the mapping, and every future import reuses it.
After setup, importing the day's orders is running the mask, not retyping the data. The numbers arrive exactly as the ERP holds them, because they were never retyped, only mapped. The hour of transcription becomes a few minutes of running an import, and the transcription errors go away entirely. See cleaning your data before importing for how to prepare the extract.
The export side works the same way. Once the schedule is built, you export promised dates or completion status back to a format your ERP can read, so the data flows both directions without re-keying either way. See exporting the schedule back to your ERP.
Masks, Not a Certified Connector
It is worth being precise about what this is. An import mask is a flexible mapping to whatever your ERP can export. It is not a certified, turnkey connector to any specific ERP product, and it does not pretend to be.
That is a strength, not a limitation. A native connector depends on a vendor building and maintaining a dedicated integration for your exact ERP, which may never happen and which locks you to a version. A mask works with any ERP that can produce a data extract, which is nearly all of them. You map the columns you actually have, save the mapping, and reuse it. You are not waiting on anyone to build you a connector, and you are not stuck if you change ERP systems, because you just remap the columns. See import masks explained for the setup in full.
A Concrete Example
Your ERP has no scheduling module, and the vendor has quoted you nothing but a long wait for a connector.
Today, someone exports the open orders to a spreadsheet, then retypes them into the scheduling spreadsheet each morning. One hour, several mistakes a week, and every mistake a potential wrong build.
Instead, you export the same orders from the ERP as you already do, then import that spreadsheet through a mask. The first time, you spend twenty minutes mapping the columns: part number, quantity, due date, routing reference. You save it. Every morning after, running the import takes a few minutes, and the data lands exactly as the ERP holds it.
The person who used to re-key spends that hour planning. The weekly transcription errors stop. The same clerical loop runs in the other direction when a shift-end paper sheet gets typed in the next morning, which is what capturing start and stop at the machine removes. And when the schedule is done, you export the promised dates back to a format the ERP reads, so sales and customer service see the same dates the floor is running. The two-way flow exists, built on exports and imports your ERP already supports, with no connector and no vendor dependency.
The Return Adds Up in Two Columns
The value shows up as recovered time and prevented errors, and both are easy to total.
| Cost of re-keying | What masks remove |
|---|---|
| An hour a day of a skilled person's time | Retyping becomes a few-minute import |
| Weekly transcription errors | Data arrives exactly as the ERP holds it |
| Wrong builds from a mistyped field | The schedule runs on the same facts as the business |
| Waiting on a vendor connector | Works with any ERP that can export data |
The recovered hour is the visible win. An hour a day is roughly a full week of a person's time every two months, spent on data entry that a saved mapping does for free. The prevented errors are the larger win, because a single wrong build costs far more than the hour that caused it. For the wider planning-time benefit, see how EDGEBIC shortens the planning cycle.
Getting the data in cleanly is also the foundation for everything else the schedule does. A finite-capacity plan is only as good as the orders it is built from, so removing the re-keying step protects every downstream benefit. For that broader picture, see what is production scheduling.
Want to see your own ERP export mapped into a working schedule? Bring a sample extract to a demo and we will build the mask with you.
Import and export masks reduce double entry by moving order and routing data between your ERP and the scheduling engine through a saved field mapping instead of manual retyping. You define once which ERP column feeds which scheduling field, and every future import reuses that mapping, so orders flow in without anyone re-keying them. The schedule then exports back the same way. The re-entry that used to take hours and introduce typos disappears, because the data moves through the mask rather than through a keyboard.
No. An import mask is a flexible mapping between your ERP's exported data, usually an Excel, CSV, or database extract, and the scheduling engine's fields. It is not a certified or turnkey connector to any specific ERP. The strength of the mask approach is that it works with whatever your ERP can export, so you are not waiting on a vendor to build a dedicated integration. You map the columns you have, save the mapping, and reuse it, which fits any ERP that can produce a data extract.
Eliminating re-keying prevents transcription errors: the transposed quantity, the wrong due date, the mistyped part number that turns a correct order into a wrong schedule. Manual re-entry is the single most error-prone step in getting data from an ERP to a scheduling tool, because every field is a chance to fumble a keystroke. When the data moves through a saved mask, the numbers arrive exactly as the ERP holds them, so the schedule is built on the same facts the rest of the business runs on.
Expert Q&A: Deep Dive
Q: Every morning someone re-types the day's orders from our ERP into the scheduling spreadsheet. It takes an hour and there are always mistakes. How do masks fix this?
A: You export the orders from your ERP as a spreadsheet or database extract, then import them through a mask that maps each ERP column to the right scheduling field. The first time, you set up the mapping; after that, every morning's import reuses it, so the hour of retyping becomes a few minutes of running the import. The mistakes go away because nobody is transcribing anything: the quantities, dates, and part numbers arrive exactly as your ERP holds them. The person who used to re-key spends the hour on planning instead.
Q: Our ERP does not have a scheduling module and the vendor will not build us a connector. Can we still get our data in and out?
A: Yes, because the mask approach does not depend on your ERP vendor building anything. If your ERP can export data to Excel, CSV, or a database, which nearly all can, you map that export to the scheduling fields once and reuse the mapping. The schedule exports back the same way, so you can push promised dates or completion status into a format your ERP can read. You get the two-way data flow without waiting on a certified connector that may never come.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Transform Your Production Scheduling?
User Solutions has been helping manufacturers optimize their production schedules for over 35 years. One-time license, 5-day implementation.

User Solutions Team
Manufacturing Software Experts
User Solutions has been developing production planning and scheduling software for manufacturers since 1991. Our team combines 35+ years of manufacturing software expertise with deep industry knowledge to help factories optimize their operations.
Share this article
Related Articles
What a Plan Built on Yesterday's Data Costs You
A schedule is only as current as its last data refresh. What goes wrong when that refresh depends on someone remembering, what an automatic sync changes, and the limits worth knowing before you trust it.
The Furnace Does Not Care How Many Hours Are Left
Batch equipment takes one job per chamber per day whatever the clock says. Scheduling it as pooled hours over-promises the constraint by a factor you can calculate.
How an Adherence Percentage Becomes an Investigation List
A percentage tells you the plan is not being followed and nothing else. The count of operations behind it is a finite work list, and pairing it with attainment tells you which of two problems you have.
