- Home
- Blog
- ERP Integration (EDGEBIC)
- EDGEBIC + MRPeasy Integration FAQ: The Questions M…
EDGEBIC + MRPeasy Integration FAQ: The Questions Manufacturers Ask First
These are the questions MRPeasy manufacturers ask in the first conversation, answered without hedging: there is no API integration, the interface is your existing CSV or Excel exports, nothing is installed in the account, and nothing you import can disturb an order already running. Each answer stands on its own, so skip to whichever one you came for.
EDGEBIC by User Solutions is a finite capacity scheduling platform that sits beside your MRP. The full walkthrough is the complete MRPeasy integration guide, and the field-level detail is in the MRPeasy to EDGEBIC mapping reference.
Does EDGEBIC connect through the MRPeasy API?
No, and that is deliberate. EDGEBIC integrates through reusable import masks that read Excel, CSV, delimited text, or a database source. You map your export's columns onto EDGEBIC's fields once and save the mask, and every later run is two clicks. Because there is no API integration, there is no add-on in the account, no integration credential, no rate limit to design around, and nothing to version-match when the platform updates on its own schedule. A connector is a dependency. A file is not.
Does EDGEBIC replace MRPeasy?
No. MRPeasy stays the cloud system of record for stock, bills of materials, purchasing, and order tracking. EDGEBIC reads exports, builds a finite capacity schedule against real shift hours and real machine counts, and hands back dates and dispatch lists as Excel files. Nothing about how your team uses MRPeasy changes. The general case for the split is in why ERP needs a scheduling add-on.
What exactly has to come out of MRPeasy?
Four exports carry a complete scheduling model, and a fifth is optional. Items (an identifier is the only mandatory column). Workstations or work centers (an identifier, plus a real machine count and capacity detail). Routings (end product, work center, an operation flag, and hours per unit). Open manufacturing orders (product, quantity, and a date). Optionally, reported labor (job number, work center, date, and hours or pieces). Any list that saves to CSV or Excel is a valid source.
Our workstations are one resource each. Is that a problem?
Only where a workstation is really several identical machines, and then it is one column to fix. If a work center is three identical benches but the export carries no count, EDGEBIC imports it as one instance and the plan comes out roughly three times too long. Map a machine-count column onto the instances field, or set the count for each multi-machine work center once inside EDGEBIC after the first import. It is preserved on every later import, so the correction never repeats. The arithmetic is in how EDGEBIC calculates work center capacity.
How long until the first real schedule?
Most shops see a first finite capacity schedule from their own data in the first working session, and a tuned one within the week. The documented benchmark in the User Solutions lineage is the Plastilite integration on Fourth Shift: 5 days, Monday to Friday, from first export to a complete optimized schedule with dates synchronized back to the ERP. That figure belongs to that case rather than being a promise, but the method is what repeats: export, map, import, schedule, tune.
Do we have to clean our routings first?
No, and the attempt usually costs a month. Import what MRPeasy holds today, schedule it, and compare the dates with what your planner believes. The disagreements are your defect list and they arrive specific: a wrong hours-per-unit shows up as a job finishing implausibly early, a missing setup time shows up as a machine that changes over for free. Because a routing re-import wipes and recreates that product's steps, each corrected file replaces the last cleanly.
Our cycle times are in minutes. Do we convert them by hand?
No. Set a conversion factor of 0.016667 on the cycle-time column in the routing mask and a 45-minute cell lands as 0.75 hours. Setup in minutes uses the same factor, seconds use 0.000278, and a time quoted per 100 pieces uses 0.01. The factor is stored on the mask, so every future import converts identically without anyone remembering to do it, and the per-run log records every row if you want to audit the math.
Do imported manufacturing orders schedule themselves?
No, and the separation is deliberate. An import changes data, the scheduler changes the plan. Imported manufacturing orders appear as unscheduled demand until you run the scheduler, and before the run starts a confirmation states the scope in plain numbers: how many jobs are new and how many existing jobs are being rescheduled. You always know the blast radius before anything moves.
Can an import disturb orders already running?
No, for two independent reasons. Every scheduled job carries a frozen snapshot of the routing it was planned with, so a routing re-import affects future jobs and leaves work in progress alone. And recorded work is never moved by any run: an operation with an actual start and an actual end is historical fact, and no reschedule, mode, or setting will shift it.
What if the same file is imported twice?
Nothing bad happens, on any entity type. Master data comes back Reused (matched and deliberately left untouched) unless you enabled updates for that run. Routing imports wipe and recreate a product's steps rather than appending, so steps never accumulate. Reported labor always overwrites the days a file carries, so a double import never double-counts and a corrected file simply fixes the earlier numbers.
Can we automate the export and the import?
Partly. The export side automates well: a scheduled extract that lands a file in a known folder with a stable name removes the only manual step that ever gets forgotten. The import side stays a deliberate act, because the result dialog exists to be read. A run that reports 40 unexpected Failed rows is information a person needs to see before the schedule is built on top of it. Most shops settle on automated exports plus a two-minute human import.
What can import never bring across?
The settings that most change what a schedule looks like, because no MRP export has a column for them. Work center groups (machine pools re-shopped on every reschedule, with per-member efficiency factors). The sequence-dependent setup matrix that lets the optimizer sequence work to cut changeover. Operator skills and rosters. Bottleneck anchoring. Lot streaming with transfer batches. Each is configured once inside EDGEBIC and then applies to every imported manufacturing order afterwards. The EDGEBIC product overview maps them and the ERP integration architecture explains where the import boundary sits.
Who runs this day to day?
The planner, in about twenty minutes each morning, without IT. Involve IT or a partner exactly once, to make the four exports saved reports with stable columns landing in a known folder. After that the routine is export, run the saved masks, run the scheduler, publish the dispatch lists. The same questions for other tools are answered in the Katana and Odoo FAQs.
Still deciding?
The fastest way to settle any of this is your own export. Pull this week's open manufacturing orders and a routing file, then bring them to a demo: mapping them live takes minutes, and you leave having watched your own shop scheduled against its own capacity.
No. EDGEBIC reads the CSV or Excel exports MRPeasy already produces through reusable import masks. There is no API integration to build, no add-on deployed in the account, and no integration credential to create or rotate. You map an export's columns onto EDGEBIC fields once and save the mask, and every run after that is two clicks with a per-run log recording each row.
No. MRPeasy stays the cloud system of record for stock, bills of materials, purchasing, and order tracking. EDGEBIC reads exports, builds a finite capacity schedule against real shift hours and real machine counts, and hands back dates and dispatch lists as Excel files. Nothing about how your team uses MRPeasy changes, and the two systems answer different questions.
No, for two independent reasons. Every scheduled job carries a frozen snapshot of the routing it was planned with, so a routing re-import affects future jobs and leaves work in progress alone. And recorded work is never moved by any run: an operation with an actual start and an actual end is historical fact, and no reschedule, mode, or setting will shift it.
Expert Q&A: Deep Dive
Q: We chose MRPeasy because it is simple and cheap to run. Does bolting on a scheduler undo that?
A: It adds one workstation-class install and about twenty minutes of weekly routine, and it changes nothing in the MRPeasy account. The setup cost lands once: four masks, built by dragging column headings onto fields, typically in a single session. After that the recurring work is export, pick the mask, press Do It, read the counts. A normal weekly run reports something like Created 24, Reused 180, Failed 0 in a couple of minutes, because master data that already matches comes back Reused and untouched. The simplicity you chose MRPeasy for stays intact, because the scheduler reads files rather than living inside the platform.
Q: MRPeasy models each workstation as one resource. We have three identical benches at final assembly. How does EDGEBIC handle that?
A: You give the work center a real instance count, and finite capacity math does the rest. If MRPeasy exports the bench as one resource, EDGEBIC imports it as one instance unless you tell it otherwise, and a three-bench operation scheduled as one would run three times too long. The fix is one column: map a machine-count column onto the instances field, or set the count for that work center once inside EDGEBIC after the first import. It is preserved on every later import, so three benches are three benches from then on, and the schedule loads them in parallel rather than stacking work on one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Transform Your Production Scheduling?
User Solutions has been helping manufacturers optimize their production schedules for over 35 years. One-time license, 5-day implementation.

User Solutions Team
Manufacturing Software Experts
User Solutions has been developing production planning and scheduling software for manufacturers since 1991. Our team combines 35+ years of manufacturing software expertise with deep industry knowledge to help factories optimize their operations.
Share this article
Related Articles
Connecting EDGEBIC to Your ERP Database With a SQL Source
How to point a scheduled EDGEBIC integration at a read-only ERP query instead of a file: testing the connection, previewing columns, checking the mask fits, and the stored-password rule that catches most teams out.
EDGEBIC ERP Integration: The Complete Guide
How EDGEBIC integrates with any ERP: eight import masks, three source options, a documented data mapping, and the weekly rhythm that keeps a finite capacity schedule current.
Closing ERP Work Orders That EDGEBIC Still Thinks Are Open
Your ERP closing a work order is invisible to EDGEBIC. There is no status column on the order mask, and a job whose every step is done is not closed automatically. Here is the closing pass that keeps your numbers honest.
